Skip to main content

Governance

These pages are dedicated to provide foundational knowledge about concepts of Governance.

Table of Contents​

This section is the entry point into the Governance material migrated into Docusaurus.

What this section covers​

The Governance section traces the idea of governance from its origins through major paradigms, historical shifts, and practical applications. It is intended to help readers move from foundational concepts into more specific forms such as corporate, enterprise, information technology, and systemic governance.

References​

  • Balloni, A. J. & Bermejo, P. H. d. S., 2010. Governance, Sociotechnical Systems and Knowledge Society: Challenges and Reflections.
  • Baragwanath, C. A., 1997. Privatisation: an audit framework for the future.
  • Boynton, A. C., Jacobs, G. C. & Zmud, R. W., 1992. Whose Responsibility is IT Management?. MIT Sloan management Review, 33(4), p. 7.
  • Brown, A. E. & Grant, G. G., 2005. Framing the frameworks: A review of IT governance research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Volume 12, p. 16.
  • Colley, J. L., 2005. What is Corporate Governance?. s.l.:s.n.
  • Cross, S. R., 2004. Corporate Governance, Information Technology and the Electronic Company in the United Kingdom. Information & Communications Technology Law, 12(2).
  • Fuch, C., 2002. Social Information and Self-Organisation. In: s.l.:s.n.
  • Fuchs, C., 2001. Structuration Theory and Self-Organisation. In: s.l.:s.n.
  • Fuchs, C., 2003. Some Implications of Pierre Boudieru's Works fora Tehory of Socail Self-Organisation. In: s.l.:s.n.
  • Fuchs, C., Feb 2003. The Role of the Individual in the Social Informaion Process. MDPI, pp. 34-60.
  • Fuchs, C., Jan 2001. Concept of Social Self-Organisation. In: s.l.:s.n.
  • Huber, N., 2004. IT looks the weak link in compliance. Computer Weekly, Issue 27 July .
  • Hufty, M., 2009. The Governance Analytical Framework.
  • ITGI, 1999. Control Objectives for Enterprise Governance.
  • ITGI, 2001. Board briefing on IT Governance.
  • Josephson, M., 1934. The Robber Barons. s.l.:New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
  • Klauninger, B., 2001. Causality and Emergence. In: Causality, Emergence and Self-Organisation. s.l.:www.self-organization.org.
  • Martin, O. L. et al., 2009. Enterprise Architecture. Berlin: Springer.
  • Meyer, N. D., 2004. Systemic IS Governance: An Introduction. Information Systems Management, 21(4).
  • Millet, B., 1998. Understanding Organisations: he Dominance of Systems Theory. International Journal of Organisation Behaviour, 1(1), pp. 1-12.
  • Ministry Of International Trade And Industry, 1999.
  • Oliveira, B. M., 2003. Etymologie du terme 'gouvernance'.
  • O'Neil, M. et al., 2005. Changes in Wagering Within the Racing Industry, s.l.: s.n.
  • Ostarkov, N., 2005. Problems of Corporate Governance in Russia. International Affairs: A Russian Journal of World Politics, Diplomacy & International Relations, 51(2), p. 4.
  • Pinto, S. & Wilson, P., 1990. Gambling in Australia, Canberra: Australian Insitutte of Criminology.
  • Robb, F. F., 1997. Some Philosophical and Logical Aspects of Information Systems. In: R. Winder, S. Probert & I. Beeson, eds. Philosophical Aspects of Information Systems. s.l.:Taylor & Francis, p. 14.
  • Shleifer, A. & Vishny, W., 1997. A survey on Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 52(2).
  • Trites, G., 2004. Director Responsibility for IT Governance. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5(2), p. 11.
  • Ulyatt, C., 2000. Privatisation in Australia.
  • Van Grembergen, W., 2004. Strategies for information technology governance. s.l.:Idea Group Publishing.
  • Weill, P. & Ross, J. W., 2004. IT Governance on one page, s.l.: CISR.
  • Weill, P. & Woodham, R., 2002. Don't Just Lead, Govern: Implementing Effective IT Governance. In: MIT Sloan management Review. s.l.:s.n.